The Census Bureau for the First Time in Decades Undercounts The Election by 4 million votes?
The more you dig into the numbers and the more data experts look into the numbers it seems the so-called coincidences are becoming stockpiles of evidence. The 2020 election just doesn't add up.
In 1992 and 1996 the Census Bureau over counted the official results by slightly more about nine million, and in 2000, 2004 and 2012 the Census Bureau overcounted by several million. The 2008 and 2016 were close data points. Keep in mind, the 2000 election was disputed in the courts, yet the Census Bureau still overcounted by 6 million votes.
In 2000, the Census Bureau recorded the number voting as almost 111 million. Yet, official results placed the tally lower 105 million.
In 2020, unlike the disputed 2000, The Census Bureau UNDERCOUNTED by nearly 4 million votes!
Pollster Richard Baris, one of the most respected pollsters in the United States.
“For everything to be on the up-and-up, we have to accept that all of these other things [indicators of fraud] … are not only all wrong at the same time, but that there are all wrong for the first time ever in some cases.”
Pollster Patrick Basham Patrick Basham taught in the Government Department at the Johns Hopkins University. He is Founding Director of the Democracy Institute, a research organization based in Washington, DC. Mr. Basham previously served as a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute.
Patrick Basham said, "Biden defied key “non-polling metrics” to defeat Trump in a way that is not statistically impossible, but it’s statistically implausible.” Patrick Basham used party registration trends, individual donation statistics, voter enthusiasm polls, Google searches, and other metrics that have historically predicted the Election Day winner until, of course, this year.
“So if we are to accept that Biden won against the trend of all these non-polling metrics, it not only means that one of these metrics was inaccurate this time for the first time ever, it means that each one of these metrics was wrong for the first time and at the same time as all of the others,” Mr. Basham continued.
More Anomalies:
Joe Biden was the first election winner since Kennedy to lose both Florida and Ohio and still become president. Biden lost over 80 percent of 17 bellwether counties, which have predicted the winner of the presidential race correctly every single time the last 50 years. While the most popular Republican (Trump) lost his election, Republican house candidates won 27 out of the 27 races that were considered toss-ups.
No presidential incumbent in the past 100 years has increased his vote and lost re-election. No incumbent that has won over 75 percent of the primary vote (Trump received 94 percent) has ever lost re-election.
USA Today Fact-Check (Don't Laugh!)
Most of the statistics (mentioned stats above) are true — but they are not proof of voter fraud.
In fact, a national coalition of election security officials described the general election as "the most secure in American history," per USA TODAY.
"There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised," USA Today concluded.
Conclusion
Fact-checks apparently behaving like the CNN anchor on live television with burning buildings in the background trying to convince the audience, "There is nothing to see here." Clearly the 2020 election has too many statistical anomalies to explain away.
https://www.tnonline.com/20201214/election-anomalies-deserve-scrutiny/
2020 Election Statistical Anomalies - Challenges We Face
https://electionwiz.com/2021/05/04/census-reveals-weird-anomaly-shows-millions-less-voted-in-2020-election-than-official-results/
https://www.bigdatapoll.com/
Comments
Post a Comment