Trusted and Triangulated News and Analysis

Why is Georgia's Secretary of State refusing to testify under oath pertaining to Dominion Voting Machines? President Donald Trump lost the state of Georgia by less than 12 thousand votes.  Obama appointed  U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg. order barred the state from using its current electronic voting machines after this year's elections.  What state reacted by spending over $100 million on a new setup same brand (Dominion Voting Machines). "A federal judge ruled Thursday that Georgia voters can cast ballots on the state's "unsecure, unreliable and grossly outdated" electronic voting machines one last time, deciding it would be too disruptive to switch to paper ballots before this fall's elections."(The Atlanta journal Constitution) Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has dismissed expert opinion about the vulnerabilities of the Dominion Machines and the previous electronic voting machines, and is even doubled down on his choice to spend over $10...

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger seems to have changed is stance on election fraud.  Dec. 7 "Well, we've never found systemic fraud, not enough to overturn the election," Raffensperger told ABC's "This Week" with George Stephanopoulos." Translated:  There was systematic fraud.    January 7, 2021 The 10-page letter goes through in some detail the myriad claims of fraud or irregularities that have been brought by allies of President Donald Trump in their quest to have Georgia's election results overturned. "Law enforcement officers with my office and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation have been diligently investigating all claims of fraud or irregularities and continue to investigate," Raffensperger writes. "Their work has shown me that there is nowhere close to sufficient evidence to put in doubt the result of the presidential contest in Georgia." Translated: There was more proof of fraud, so I did my job in checking...

 Common sense would seem to dictate that if the claims by many powerful and influential officials and media that the 2020 presidential election was secure and fair that an audit of the results should not cause these same individuals angst.  So what is the opposition and panic about? Judge Daniel Martin, who is now presiding over the Arizona Senate Republicans’ audit of the Maricopa County 2020 election results, is a Democrat appointee who worked for a firm that merged with Perkins Coie, the pro-Democrat powerhouse firm that is trying to shut down the Maricopa County audit. Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Daniel Martin said, “I will share with you all, I am not yet persuaded that there has been a showing that the rights of the voters in Maricopa County are being protected,” Martin said. “And I think we will touch on this tomorrow when we address the policies and procedures and whether or not they can be withheld from public view."   The audit is being lived st...