Factcheck Source Ryan Macias caught impersonating a reporter in Arizona audit

Across the country The Arizona audit has, like any voter fraud claim or hint of impropriety since the beginning of the 2020 presidential election been dismissed and trivialized.  



Mathematician Edward Solomon looked into the results of the 2020 Presidential election at a precinct level and determined they are “impossible” and “cannot occur naturally.”

The results of the 2020 election are simply not possible. When looking at the precinct level, mathematician Edward Solomon says computers must have used an algorithm to change the results.

The media response was to attack the messenger and avoid the discussion of the very convincing evidence Mr. Solomon had laid out.  

Gifted school teacher and expert in data analysis, Dr. Douglas Frank

Dr  Frank explains how he has been able to predict the number of votes based on an algorithm key.  That's not possible unless the votes were being manipulated by a machine.

The media has tried to minimize Dr Frank as just a part-time math teacher. The media forgot to mention a few other things.

1990, he received a Ph.D. in Surface Analytical Chemistry. After graduating, he formed "ADAM Instrument Company, Inc.," named for the new surface analysis technique he discovered during his graduate studies. The "ADAM" technique brought him international acclaim, and his work was featured in several scientific books and international journals, including cover articles in Science and Naturwissenschaften. He has over 50 scientific publications, and is internationally regarded as an expert in Auger spectroscopy.

Dr. Frank was silenced on social media for questioning the lockdowns that he based not on any news reports but on analysis of the numbers posted on government websites.  

Fact check.org quoted Ga Sec Gabriel Sterling

"In order for an algorithm to tamper with votes it would have to access both the election management system (EMS), which tabulates the votes, and the election night reporting system (ENR), which publishes the results.  The EMS is not connected to the internet, So there would be no way for a computer running a nefarious algorithm to reach it," claimed Sterling. 

Jovan Pulitzer showed on live television how the election voting machines could be and were being hacked quite easily, disproving the myth that the machines were secure and not online.  And this video evidence  overcame the objection of the fact check report.

Pulitzer pointed out ,"Statistically, what can be going on when you have an operation like this, is as that data’s being exchanged and somebody’s in it, can actually siphon off that data and modify the data and feed it right back into the system or kind of do a pump-and-dump in real time.… It creates that kind of atmosphere where, not only are you in the system, but then, once you get into the machine, you can do stuff in real time — changing its intent.”

Ballots: "What I’m saying is all of these problems you’ve heard today can be corrected and detected now by the simplest of things. It takes you days or weeks to recount votes. Give me these 500,000 ballots and we’ll have them done in two hours," Pulitzer stated at the Georgia hearings. 

Pulitizer’s findings are in line with those of Colonel Phil Waldron, a cybersecurity expert who spoke at a hearing before Arizona Republican lawmakers last month. During that meeting, Waldron also confirmed that the Dominion machines are connected to the Internet and that experts witnessed Dominion communicating with Frankfurt, Germany, on Election Day.


MIT graduate Dr. Shiva

A group of computer scientists led by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, an MIT-educated Fulbright Scholar, presented what appeared to be a cut-and-dry case of systemic fraud that stemmed from the voting software used in several Michigan counties.

Case 1:20-cv-12080-MLW). Judge D. J. Wolf has agreed to allow Dr Shiva to lay out his case that Dominion voting systems was rigged and his loss during his personal campaign in the state of Massachusetts.

This case will provide Dr. Ayyurdai the opportunity to present the evidence of the fraud that involved Dominion Voting Systems machines and erased votes that should have been counted for him. Not only that, it also will show that the same fraud was perpetrated against Donald Trump.

Antrim County, Michigan Audit

After the forensic examination of 16 Dominion Voting machines in Antrim, Co. MI, Allied Security Operations Group has concluded that the Dominion Voting machines were assigned a 68.05% error rate. DePerno explained that when ballots are put through the machine, a whopping 68.05% error rate means that 68.05% of the ballots are sent for bulk adjudication, which means they collect the ballots in a folder. “The ballots are sent somewhere where people in another location can change the vote,” DePerno explained.

Based on the Allied Security Operations report, Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno states: “we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.

Again factcheck.org dismissed this audit.

Macias said the report showed “ASOG has a grave misunderstanding of the DVS DSuite 5.5 voting system, a lack of knowledge of election technology and process, and therefore, has come to a preposterous conclusion.”

Other experts also said the report doesn’t back up its claims that Dominion’s software had been designed to allow election fraud.

“In Antrim County, some elections office staff made an error in data handling… and they caught the mistake, and fixed it,” John Sebes, the co-founder and chief technology officer of the nonpartisan Open Source Elections Technology Institute, said in a phone interview. “That’s making mistakes and catching mistakes, it’s not committing fraud.”

The Factcheck conveniently forgot to address..

 The only reason to change software after the election would be to obfuscate evidence of fraud and/or to correct program errors that would de-certify the election. There is a difference between mistakes and fraud.  The audit report exposed to 68% error rate amongst many other technical glitches that just can't be explained away.

Factcheck as well as the media try to paint allied securities operation group as incompetent.  If they were incompetent they would not be regularly used by Organizations all over the world, MIT, and federal government agencies, including NASA.  Fact check has a real problem with cherry picking their sources and claiming those involved that go against their fact check summary conveniently never respond back to them.

Maricopa Arizona Audit

Recently the organization in charge of the Maricopa audit tweeted
"You might be held accountable for having your paid election expert Ryan Macias impersonate a reporter and try to sneak past security to get on the ballot floor. More to come!"

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs called for investigation into election audit security lapses.
Apparently she might have crossed the line by sending an impersonator to spy on the team appointed to audit Maricopa county.

FLASHBACK- Ryan Macias, FactCheck Source for The ANTRIM COUNTY AUDIT 

Ryan Macias, the former head of voting system testing and certification at the Election Assistance Commission, said, "The majority of the findings are false and misleading due to the fact that the entities reviewing the system lack knowledge and expertise in election technology."  Gee, does anyone wonder what he's going to say about the results of this audit?  

Why are they fighting against the audit so hard?

What you see on the floor of the audit is just the tip of the iceberg.  Do not  forget about the canvassing, digital forensics and even physical forensics that are being done in parallel.


P.S. Shouldn’t an audit of the “most secure election in history” be welcomed with open arms?

More to recall...


The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved (Rigged) the 2020 Election


In a way, Trump was right,” writes Time national political correspondent Molly Ball. “There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes.” She later describes this “conspiracy” as something that “sounds like a paranoid fever dream — a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.”


https://coloradotimesrecorder.com/2021/04/election-fraud-conspiracies-still-abound-among-colorado-republicans/35621/

Factcheck.org

https://thenewamerican.com/at-georgia-hearing-expert-confirms-he-discovered-how-to-hack-dominion-machines/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/dr-ayyadurais-wins-key-victory-election-fraud-case/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/mathematician-edward-solomon-determined-2020-election-results-precinct-level-impossible-cannot-occur-naturally/

https://gcatoolkit.org/advisory-committee/ryan-macias/

https://rumble.com/vdtuyr-election-results-mathematically-impossible-professor-david-clements-with-ed.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HARVEST PREP BASEBALL WINS THEIR FIRST GAME IN 9 YEARS!!!!!!

The Peculiar Downplaying of Sex Trafficking is creating the Marriage with Children Effect

If Texas goes Blue, it's GAME OVER!