Another "Conspiracy Theory" comes true?
The corporate media has been quick to dismiss the Durham report. Is it possible their dismissal is in part because the report implies the media is complicit?
National Review-The Durham investigation.
Special Counsel John Durham, of course, is scrutinizing the origins of the Obama administration’s Trump/Russia probe — a probe that holdover officials at the FBI and other government national-security agencies extended into the Trump administration, even as Donald Trump was the sitting president of the United States and, at least
The Hillary-Obama-Biden crew and their spy chiefs aided Putin in his goal as they pursued their own objective of casting Trump’s presidency as illegitimate. They ran a Soviet-style Playbook, weaponizing intelligence resources and processes to spy on innocent Americans, such as Trump’s former National Security Advisor, General Michael Flynn.
Mark Meadows, Trump's former chief of staff, said in a tweet on Saturday, "They didn’t just spy on Donald Trump’s campaign. They spied on Donald Trump as sitting President of the United States. It was all even worse than we thought."
Although it's obvious to most that the Durham report exposes extreme corruption connected to the Hillary Clinton team, the mainstream media still labels this report, "a right-wing conspiracy".
The evidence is obvious but some people seem to be above the law especially when the media seems to be co-conspirators.
Comments
Post a Comment