46 Reasons The Deep State is funding Ukraine

Weather for ominous reasons or simply profit, there are 46 reasons for such a huge financial interest in keeping Ukraine afloat.

46 U.S. biolabs operating in Ukraine. 

The claim that there are 46 biolabs in Ukraine has been a topic of controversy, particularly since the start of the Russian invasion in 2022. 

Various theories and circulated, suggesting that these labs were involved in developing biological weapons or conducting unethical experiments. Deniers say there is no "credible evidence" to support these claims.

Many of these facilities were part of "international public health and research collaborations." 

One example, Ukraine had partnerships with the United States, particularly under the Biological Threat Reduction Program (BTRP), a project designed to secure and safely dismantle former Soviet-era biological weapon facilities and to support public health initiatives. These labs were said to be primarily focused on preventing the spread of infectious diseases, improving Ukraine's capacity to handle public health crises, and conducting research on diseases like anthrax, rabies, and avian influenza.

Ukraine also worked with international organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) to "strengthen its biosecurity infrastructure and improve its public health capabilities."

The Author of the Bio Weapons ACT and Current Professor,  Dr. Francis Boyle

Dr. Francis Boyle has also commented on the situation in Ukraine, particularly in relation to U.S. biological research and labs in the country. Boyle has raised concerns about the presence of biological laboratories in Ukraine, some of which were funded and supported by the U.S. under programs like the Biological Threat Reduction Program (BTRP), a U.S. initiative aimed at securing former Soviet-era biological research facilities and preventing the spread of dangerous pathogens.

Boyle has made the claim that these labs could be used for the development of biological weapons, and he has suggested that they are a source of potential conflict, especially in the context of the Russia-Ukraine war. Boyle has also argued that the presence of such facilities in Ukraine may have contributed to the escalation of tensions, particularly as Russia has repeatedly alleged that Ukraine, with U.S. support, could be involved in biological weapons research.

Key Points in Boyle's Statements on Ukraine

Biological Labs in Ukraine: Dr. Boyle has voiced concerns that the biological research labs in Ukraine, particularly those funded by the U.S., might be engaged in research that violates international conventions on biological weapons, including the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). He believes that the U.S. government and its agencies, such as the Department of Defense, might be involved in research at these labs that could be considered unethical or in violation of international law.

U.S. Involvement: Boyle has been critical of the U.S. government's involvement in these labs, suggesting that the research carried out in Ukraine could be a cover for the development of bioweapons. He argues that the U.S. has been using Ukraine as a testing ground for biological research that could have military applications, especially in the context of gain-of-function research, which modifies pathogens to enhance their infectivity or transmissibility.

Russian Allegations: The Russian government has repeatedly claimed that U.S. and Ukrainian biolabs are involved in illegal biological weapons research. Russia's accusations have been part of the broader disinformation campaign around the war in Ukraine. While these claims have been widely disputed by international organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. State Department, Boyle appears to give some credence to the idea that there could be hidden military research at these labs.

Ethical Concerns: Boyle's criticisms are not limited to Ukraine but extend to U.S. biowarfare programs more broadly. He has expressed ethical concerns about the potential misuse of biotechnology, arguing that the development of biological weapons could be catastrophic and that governments, including the U.S., might be crossing moral boundaries with certain research programs.

Scientific and Diplomatic Responses

U.S. Government Denials: The U.S. government has repeatedly denied that any of its supported biological research in Ukraine is connected to the development of biological weapons. The facilities funded by the U.S. are part of an effort to secure and safeguard dangerous pathogens and prevent their misuse, as well as to improve public health infrastructure in Ukraine.

International Oversight: International bodies like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations have stated that the labs in Ukraine, like those in other countries, are primarily focused on public health research and are subject to international oversight and regulations. These labs focus on preventing the spread of diseases, researching viruses, and improving diagnostic capacities.

Conclusion

Dr. Boyle's statements about Ukraine, particularly his concerns about biological labs and the potential for biological weapons research, reflect his broader skepticism about the ethical implications of biotechnological research and the role of the U.S. government in such endeavors. However, these claims are denied and do not align with the "mainstream scientific consensus" or the official positions of international health organizations, which claims the research in Ukraine was legitimate, focused on public health and biosecurity, not biological warfare. 

The Washington Post admitted...

The fact that 60% of direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising spend within the pharmaceutical industry is attributed to the top 20 advertised drugs, meaning these top drugs account for a significant portion of total pharmaceutical advertising revenue, is no "conspiracy theory. "